Define the expected outcome for the team building exercise. Which of the two, the in-house trainer or external expert, understand and align better? Which of them, do you feel, will be able to extract the desired learnings from participants?
Verdict:…
Focus
Which of the two have the edge on experience and command/ control over groups while conducting team building games and activities?
Verdict: In-house trainers may match external expertise and skills. But, they would feel pressured when handling seniors or colleagues…
Experience
In team building, one size does not fit all – so customization is critical. Rounds of meetings with senior management and interviews with the cohort is required before finalizing a tailor-made program.
Verdict: Most convenient when done by an in-house…
Customization and Convenience
It takes time to think, plan, iterate and execute. Equipment, props and consumables for games and activities need to be procured – including sampling and testing.
Verdict: Outsourced experts have a standard set of customizable programs and a storehouse filled…
Time Commitment
Includes the trainer fees (when outsourcing): Cost of props, equipment and consumables; travel, board and lodge. Also gifts/ prizes for winners, banners, and other related paraphernalia.
Verdict: The investment on an outsourced expert would naturally be higher than an in-house…
Budget Considerations
Effectiveness is seen in post-session behavioral changes and improvements. These are catalyzed and driven by learning outcomes (debriefs) of the various activities. This is the most critical point – as the program may be economical, convenient and faster to organize,…
Risk and Effectiveness
Share this blog on your favorite platform:
